Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darius Ihsan's avatar

Fantastically written, Dr. Barrett!

I’m in awe just how many journalists and alternative media members I respect, seem to buy this entire assassination narrative as the MSM tell it.

Now the Zionist Western media beginning to circulate claims that Iran was responsible for the attempt. A similar case to 9/11. Immediately after the attack, the Zionist media began circulating claims that Iran was responsible.

It’s likely that just as Mossad and CIA have done many false flag attacks to bring the US into a Middle East war with Iran, they most likely carried out an attempted assassination to bring the US into a Middle East war targeting Iran.

Expand full comment
Anonymous's avatar

As I commented elsewhere, not one, but two miraculous events happened simultaneously:

- Trump turned his head at the exact moment to save his life

- A photographer snapped a photo of the bullet flying past Trump's head

If we go back to 9/11, I think it's fair to say that it would be more likely that the FBI would "find" the passport of one of the hijackers if the passport will be used in an attempt to blame the Muslim hijackers for what happened, rather than the passport miraculously surviving the plane crash. In the case of Trump assassination, I think it's fair to say that it would be more likely that a photo showing the bullet going past Trump's head would be "taken" and presented to the public if such a photo was needed as evidence that indeed there was a bullet that hit Trump's ear, rather than such a photo being taken by random chance. If there was no bullet but they had to prove that there was one, you'd expect such a photo to appear. On the other hand, if there was a bullet, you'd expect the chance of someone photographing it at just the right moment was <1%. Trump actually dodging that bullet and that photo actually being taken are two independent low-probability events. Both of them happening at the same time is less probable than each one of them happening on their own (it would be the probability of the first event multiplied by the probability of the second event). On the other hand, if dodging the bullet was fake, then it's highly likely that a fake photo of the bullet would appear, as they are no longer independent events but parts of the same event of faking the assassination.

I'd say the burden of proof that these two miracles actually happened simultaneously is on those who claim that they did happen. I don't think Trump having some blood (or liquid resembling blood) on his ear after he got up is convincing enough to start believing in such miracles. Any prosaic explanations of how this could have been faked are more likely to be true than a double miracle, especially given that the second miracle (the photo with the bullet) is conveniently used as evidence that the first miracle (Trump dodging the bullet) happened.

Expand full comment
78 more comments...

No posts