First 30 minutes: Rolf Lindgren voices outrage at the raid on Mar-a-Lago, and wonders about its real purpose. Was the FBI trying to prevent Trump from building a LEGO H-bomb in his basement? Or was the Deep State trying to deprive Trump of documents that could be useful in his Russiagate lawsuits
MM is no longer credible to me. He is in Satanic "total accusation " mode. The TV camera theory just isn't true. Screens are omnipresent now. Every murder in the world MM seems to think is fake. Furthermore MKULTRA as elucidated by McGowan makes more sense than crisis actors from a purely monetary standpoint. There were commonalities between the Lanza and Holmes families as well.
OK, fair enough - but why hasn't KB presented a single death certificate? Such evidence would be easily discoverable if it existed and fatal to Fetzer's argument. It is curious to me that KB would instead find MSM more credible than Fetzer.
I also object to KB's ongoing slander and ridicule of Dr. Judy Wood.
The idea that the official version of Sandy hook is true, defies logic. There has never been a shred of evidence to support the official version that can withstand scrutiny, and there's a ton of evidence that clear,y disproves the official narrative. It's about as clear cut as 9/11 or the Boston bombing, Sandy hook was a staged event.
I have looked at arguments alleging that crisis actors staged pseudo-violent events where nobody died—for example, Fetzer's books on Sandy Hook and Boston, and internet reports on Las Vegas and Nice—and in none of those cases did I find the "nobody died" arguments convincing. The one thing I'm sure of is that Cass Sunstein and his friends WANT "conspiracy theorists" to spread the "crisis actors" and "nobody died" memes.
Obviously there are all sorts of claims and purported evidence both that many people died, and that they didn't. Having looked at some of both, I think it's likely that all of those named in MSM as dying actually did die. I have read Jim's book and Mary Maxwell's book, watched a fair bit of video and repeatedly interviewed and read James Tracy, and still find the "nobody died" perspective unsupported by convincing evidence, and probably manufactured by Cass Sunstein's friends. But I would be happy to look at a concise, well-organanized argument citing the best evidence on the other side, if you can point me to it. If there isn't one - and at this point I'm pretty sure there isn't - then that speaks volumes.
This is my last word on the topic in these comments.
Okay, leave aside the question of whether anyone died, do you concede it was a staged event? Are you aware of the electronic billboard that read Everyone must sign in? Do you know how many pizzas were delivered to the event, or crates of bottled water, or porta loos? Does it strike you as strange, that so much organisation went into the event PRIOR to the alleged shootings?
I don't recall seeing any definitive proof that any of these things happened prior to the shootings. It looks to me like photos taken after the shootings, when a media circus was in town, were falsely (possibly deliberately, with photoshopped changes etc.) presented as having been taken prior to the shootings. In any case, I have no interest in debating this here. Feel free to send a url of the best concise argument for your position.
So you're suggesting that in the immediate aftermath of these alleged shootings, someone thought to organise an electronic billboard, port-a-loos and crates of bottled water, but no one thought to call for medivac or paramedics. How well do you know this case, Kevin?
Your friend Dr. Fetzer stated categorically that NO ONE died. To refute this merely requires a single death certificate. Are you unable to find even one?
Well Kevin, I'm very disappointed, but I'm beginning to understand why it took you like, what was it, 4 years to realise the official version of 9/11 was bogus. You obviously didn't give much scrutiny to the SH event either. I'm surprised you would lend any credence at all to the official narrative on that particular issue, especially given what you know about how the deep state operates.
Miles Mathis says that TV cameras in a courtroom is sufficient evidence to prove an Intel fakejob.
Mathis also calls KB a shill which to me ignores his years of careful research.
MM is no longer credible to me. He is in Satanic "total accusation " mode. The TV camera theory just isn't true. Screens are omnipresent now. Every murder in the world MM seems to think is fake. Furthermore MKULTRA as elucidated by McGowan makes more sense than crisis actors from a purely monetary standpoint. There were commonalities between the Lanza and Holmes families as well.
OK, fair enough - but why hasn't KB presented a single death certificate? Such evidence would be easily discoverable if it existed and fatal to Fetzer's argument. It is curious to me that KB would instead find MSM more credible than Fetzer.
I also object to KB's ongoing slander and ridicule of Dr. Judy Wood.
The idea that the official version of Sandy hook is true, defies logic. There has never been a shred of evidence to support the official version that can withstand scrutiny, and there's a ton of evidence that clear,y disproves the official narrative. It's about as clear cut as 9/11 or the Boston bombing, Sandy hook was a staged event.
I have looked at arguments alleging that crisis actors staged pseudo-violent events where nobody died—for example, Fetzer's books on Sandy Hook and Boston, and internet reports on Las Vegas and Nice—and in none of those cases did I find the "nobody died" arguments convincing. The one thing I'm sure of is that Cass Sunstein and his friends WANT "conspiracy theorists" to spread the "crisis actors" and "nobody died" memes.
Cass Susstein!? Jeez Kevin, sounds like a lazy rationalisation for accepting the official narrative at face value.
But what evidence is there that anyone died?
Obviously there are all sorts of claims and purported evidence both that many people died, and that they didn't. Having looked at some of both, I think it's likely that all of those named in MSM as dying actually did die. I have read Jim's book and Mary Maxwell's book, watched a fair bit of video and repeatedly interviewed and read James Tracy, and still find the "nobody died" perspective unsupported by convincing evidence, and probably manufactured by Cass Sunstein's friends. But I would be happy to look at a concise, well-organanized argument citing the best evidence on the other side, if you can point me to it. If there isn't one - and at this point I'm pretty sure there isn't - then that speaks volumes.
This is my last word on the topic in these comments.
Okay, leave aside the question of whether anyone died, do you concede it was a staged event? Are you aware of the electronic billboard that read Everyone must sign in? Do you know how many pizzas were delivered to the event, or crates of bottled water, or porta loos? Does it strike you as strange, that so much organisation went into the event PRIOR to the alleged shootings?
I don't recall seeing any definitive proof that any of these things happened prior to the shootings. It looks to me like photos taken after the shootings, when a media circus was in town, were falsely (possibly deliberately, with photoshopped changes etc.) presented as having been taken prior to the shootings. In any case, I have no interest in debating this here. Feel free to send a url of the best concise argument for your position.
So you're suggesting that in the immediate aftermath of these alleged shootings, someone thought to organise an electronic billboard, port-a-loos and crates of bottled water, but no one thought to call for medivac or paramedics. How well do you know this case, Kevin?
Your friend Dr. Fetzer stated categorically that NO ONE died. To refute this merely requires a single death certificate. Are you unable to find even one?
Well Kevin, I'm very disappointed, but I'm beginning to understand why it took you like, what was it, 4 years to realise the official version of 9/11 was bogus. You obviously didn't give much scrutiny to the SH event either. I'm surprised you would lend any credence at all to the official narrative on that particular issue, especially given what you know about how the deep state operates.
So tell us, Kevin, who can be proved to have died at Sandy Hook?
Fetzer's simplest plan should have beento move to dismiss for Posner's failure to prove that there even is such a real person as Leonard Posner