13 Comments
User's avatar
polistra's avatar

The original non-dictionary definition of fascism describes the situation best. Mussolini invented the word, and he meant simply "My will and my orders." Fascism was the personal desires of the dictator AT THIS MINUTE, and nothing else.

A psychopath's orders change every minute. Rapid change is the key. Victims must never be allowed to regain their balance. A new SHOCK comes just when you think you're safe. You get a brief reprieve, you start breathing again, and then STOMP from an unexpected direction.

Now we don't use the word Fascism. We use the word Science to mean "Whatever Fauci wants to do at this minute."

Fauci said it directly and explicitly.

I AM SCIENCE. DO AS YOU'RE TOLD.

Expand full comment
Peter Solinski's avatar

Are the neo-cons really a factor in a Klaus Schwab and company controlled world? And with hypersonics, aren't the Russians and Chinese more first strike capable than the U.S.?

Expand full comment
Kevin Barrett's avatar

Yes, the neocons are unfortunately still a factor. They unleashed COVID by attacking China and Iran. Schwab dreams more than he controls. And the Russians and Chinese and Iranians play defense, since they are gradually getting stronger, while the US plays offense (and is and has always been the only country seriously planning to win nuclear war via first strike).

Expand full comment
Peter Solinski's avatar

I'm pretty sure they were planning on leaving Afghanistan in an orderly manner, establishing Iraq as a haven for democracy and all Muslims worshipping Bibi Netanyahu, but, it was never going to happen. How do you win an all out nuclear war?

Expand full comment
Kevin Barrett's avatar

According to the crazies, you win by "losing 20 or 30 million people, tops" while completely destroying the enemy. How? With a sneak attack that takes out most of their retaliatory capability. Weapons in space are the best method for such a sneak attack, and the US has been pursuing a total first strike capability based on space weapons since the 1970s. Listen to my latest interview with Richard Cook: https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/2021/11/cook/

Expand full comment
Peter Solinski's avatar

Thanks for talking to me Dr. Barret, I'm honored.

Expand full comment
Kevin Barrett's avatar

No problem, those are good questions.

Expand full comment
Peter Solinski's avatar

One last question, isn't Klaus Schwab's mother a Rothschild? Maybe has more power than you think.

Expand full comment
Kevin Barrett's avatar

That is possible.

Expand full comment
Peter Solinski's avatar

Why would globalists want a shooting war with countries that are adept at controlling their populations through established authoritarian culture, in Russia, North Korea and Iran's case, or digitization of behavioral reward and punishment systems, in China. The fact that they haven't been able to bring Venezuela to heel says volumes about the diminishing power of the U.S. Besides, Russian and Chinese weapons and armies are superior to thoroughly modern Milley and the trans-formative troops that he leads.

Expand full comment
Kevin Barrett's avatar

Neocons love war. And they don't like traditional authoritarian culture. Their motto is "creative destruction." The US has been planning to win World War 3 in a first nuclear strike since around 1950. It's a miracle it hasn't happened yet...no thanks to the neocons.

Expand full comment