Rumble link Bitchute link Dismantle the Matrix Analysis on YouTube “Kevin Barrett 911 whistleblower on Hannity and Colmes” original YouTube
The 25th anniversary of 9/11 is also, more or less, the 20th anniversary of the Fox News interview that got me expelled from American academia. That interview, conducted on July 11 2006, went viral on a brand-new platform called YouTube. It shot to over 100,000 views within a week or two…and the count mysteriously froze. Today it supposedly has 100,608 views…which seems a tad low, since I’ve probably gotten more than 608 emails about it during the past 20 years. Google Gemini goes full conspiracy theorist on this one:
The exact video link you shared—your Hannity & Colmes Fox News interview from July 2006—is the ultimate textbook example of YouTube’s Borderline Content Policy and Information Panel intervention. The platform is not malfunctioning; instead, your specific video has been placed into a tightly controlled algorithmic quarantine.
In 2013, a 30-minute YouTube analysis of my five-minute Fox News interview went viral and currently sits at 217k views. I’ve posted it above, and transcribed it below.
The narrator, a certain Jonathan Adampants, analyzes Hannity & Colmes’ propaganda techniques using the framework of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). As it happens, my aunt and uncle, Mary and Robert Goulding, were close-up-and-personal rivals of the founders of NLP. Aunt Mary and Uncle Bob ran WIGFT (pronounced Wig-Foot), the Western Institute of Group and Family Therapy, in the mountains of Watsonville near Santa Cruz. Meanwhile, down at UC Santa Cruz, John Grinder and Richard Bandler were stealing their stuff.
My aunt and uncle used Eric Berne’s Transactional Analysis (TA) and Fritz Perls’ Gestalt therapy in their Redecision Therapy. Basically they taught people how to “flip the script” of their lives and change their habits, outlook, and cognitive and emotional orientation, replacing dysfunctional and unpleasant patterns with more enjoyable and productive ones.
Grinder and Bandler did the same thing, but in streamlined and (some would say) dehumanized form. They turned it into engineering: push this button, get that behavior. Unlike my aunt and uncle, they didn’t fully credit their sources.
Does NLP work? The experts are still arguing. Despite its technical jargon, NLP—like its close cousin, hypnotism—is an art, not a science. But whatever its limitations, NLP does offer a useful framework for analyzing certain kinds of propagandistic performances. Gemini cites a couple of conspiracy theories that are not entirely untrue:
The Barack Obama “Hypnosis” Theory: During the 2008 U.S. presidential election, a widely circulated, 67-page anonymous document claimed that Obama’s speeches utilized sophisticated NLP techniques. Critics accused him of using pacing and leading (matching the audience’s current state and then subtly moving them toward a desired emotional state), hypnotic vocal pacing, and deliberate hand gestures as anchors to covertly implant subconscious suggestions.[1]
The Donald Trump “Persuasion” Analysis: During the 2016 and 2020 elections, popular Dilbert creator and persuasion blogger Scott Adams, along with various media commentators, frequently analyzed Trump’s communication through an NLP lens. They argued that his use of repetitive nicknames (”Crooked Hillary,” “Lyin’ Ted”), intentional hyperbole, and linguistic pacing were highly effective forms of subliminal behavioral programming designed to bypass rational thought. [1]
Adampants’ analysis of my Hannity interview gets a lot right. He correctly calls out the Fox hosts’ name-calling, disruptions, deprecating glances and gestures, and avoidance of reasoned discussion. He understands that Hannity and Colmes’ purpose was to program the audience’s subconscious by attaching negative associations to me personally, and, by association, to 9/11 skeptics in general.
But Adampants exaggerates the effectiveness of Hannity and Colmes’ NLP sorcery. He wrongly assumes that I was being influenced by the Fox hosts’ gestures:
“By bringing his hands down like that, he’s trying to subconsciously take away the focus of the professor, take away his power, and that’s exactly what he’s doing.”
and:
“The issue at hand here, what he’s doing, is directing the professor to look at his hand (making the 6-6-6 gesture).”
In reality, I couldn’t see those gestures. I was sitting on a tall chair high atop a platform in the middle of the Fox studio in Milwaukee staring into a camera, wearing headphones, with no screen or monitor. Fox employees were at their desks along the sides of the room, and I was on display in the middle. I assumed the Fox studio people had put me in that off-putting, uncomfortable set-up in an effort to throw me off my game. But maybe they inadvertently saved me from being hypnotized by Hannity’s satanic hand signs!
I’m also skeptical about Adampants’ assumption that the Fox hosts’ mind-control efforts succeeded, whether on me or on the audience. If this clip were really such a powerful bit of anti-9/11-truth sorcery, why would YouTube have to quarantine it?
Watch the interview and/or the “total breakdown” and let me know what you think.
—
Total Breakdown of The Media’s Use of NLP & Mind Control
Colmes: That was University of Wisconsin professor Kevin Barrett, who has recently drawn criticism for plans to teach an Islamic studies course next fall that will incorporate conspiracy theories that the U.S. government was involved in the events of September 11th. Professor Barrett joins us now. Professor, can you give us the context within which you teach this?
Jonathan Adampants: Okay. Well, you’ve just seen here is he used a nonverbal gesture with his hands in an outward motion to kind of scatter his thinking, and then swayed both of his hands over to his left shoulder, which would give the subconscious impression of being far to the left and also kind of distracts his thinking a little bit. So that’s what he’s doing. That’s why his hands are all over the place. And then they swing over to his left shoulder to send the subconscious message that he is an extremist, a left winger. Okay.
Colmes: Can you give us the context within which you teach this?
Kevin Barrett: Well, yeah, sure. I’m teaching an introductory course on Islam, and I think it’s really important to cover these contemporary political issues. And one of them is, of course, the so-called war on terror. Now, the fact is that the great majority of the world’s Muslims believe that 9/11 was an inside job.
Colmes: And that’s your opinion, right?
Jonathan Adampants: Again, manipulation is all about timing and redirecting and trying to take control of somebody when they’re speaking here. You see a great example of that by saying that’s your opinion. Even though he just stated there’s a vast number of people that are waking up, even though he specifies the Muslim community. That’s not true. It’s all over the world. So the journalist’s responsibility to misdirect his thinking and to to mislead you is to follow up and say, but that’s your opinion. Even though he stated that it wasn’t just his opinion, but it doesn’t matter because people believe what they hear from newscasters. They take in the barrage of words. And the newscaster here understands that. So if he says that he plants that seed.
Kevin Barrett: Now, the fact is that the great majority of the world’s Muslims believe that 9/11 was an inside job.
Colmes: But that’s your opinion, right?
Kevin Barrett: Well, after studying the evidence pretty intensively for two and a half years, I am convinced that 9/11 was in fact an inside job.
Colmes: Are students required to regurgitate that in some way in order to do well in your classroom?
Jonathan Adampants: Again, more manipulation. I’m sure you caught that. Even though this very system of the world creates people to regurgitate, they will often accuse people of doing the things that they do. It’s just part of it. Okay. So by saying our students required to regurgitate, that gives the subconscious impression that he is controlling their minds and not teaching them to think, when in actuality, to be able to see through the media, to be able to see what is going on is not regurgitation. Any person that does regurgitate and only memorize and not think would not be able to see through it anyway. It doesn’t matter. This is reverse psychology. This is just not even that. It’s just manipulation. It’s just name calling. It’s I’m rubber. You’re glue. Again, this is a way that he disrupts the guy’s thinking with petty comments like that. He knows that this type of person would never want anybody to regurgitate anything, because that doesn’t allow them to learn to think. Doesn’t matter if there is an audience to this. He plants that seed again.
Kevin Barrett: Well, after studying the evidence pretty intensively for two and a half years, I am convinced that 9/11 was in fact an inside job.
Colmes: Are students required to regurgitate that in some way in order to do well in your class?
Kevin Barrett: That’s ridiculous. No, I’m not interested in making students regurgitate anything.
Hannity: All right, Mr. Barrett, Sean Hannity here. Do you really believe that 9/11 was an inside job?
Jonathan Adampants: Okay. Sean Hannity, I never watched Fox News before, but within seconds of seeing this guy, you can just see that he is a snake. Or at least he is currently conducting himself as such. Now this is pretty basic what he’s doing. He’s not giving eye contact. He’s pretending to be bored with the guy’s very presence. And this is a way to discredit him that way, as if he’s just a some sort of gnat and not even worth considering. And that’s why he’s purposely looking down and acting bored when he talks to him. Secondly, he uses the word believe. Do you really believe? To believe is not to know. And that’s why he’s stressing that. And again, you’re going to start to see extreme manipulation from this, Mr. Hannity.
Hannity: All right, Mr. Barrett, Sean Hannity here. Do you really believe that 9/11 was an inside job, not just 9/11, but Madrid and Bali and the Zarqawi operation?
Jonathan Adampants: All right. So what he does is he tries to take control of this conversation right away. He insinuates something, and the professor was smart enough to catch what he was saying. And then when he tried to respond to that, he interrupts him to take control. Now notice, and I’ll point this out in a little bit when he puts his hand up in the okay sign, you’re about to learn what that really means and what they use it for. But for now, just understand that that’s how they’ll do it. They’ll insult you while they speak and try to continue speaking before you can actually reply to it. And therefore it makes the professor look nuts, you know what I mean? Because if people don’t catch this neurolinguistic programming, if they don’t catch the manipulation, you know, which comprises the majority of the audience anyway. Nevertheless, if they don’t catch it, then he can do that. He can take those cheap shots. And when the professor tries to correct those, then he interrupts him, says, hey, hold on, you know, and then tries to make him look rude for interrupting and take control over him and disrupt his thinking at the same time.
Hannity: The Zarqawi operation—
Kevin Barrett: Well, you know, actually.
Hannity: Hold on a second.
Kevin Barrett: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Hannity: You believe personally that these are inside jobs? Yes or no?
Kevin Barrett: It’s not quite that simple.
Jonathan Adampants: Okay. I believe personally that’s another way to plant that into your psyche, that it is just he that believes this. And then he uses the yes or no trap, because that is again, misleading. If you can’t see that the way he twisted around that question would not allow the professor to be able to give a yes or no answer, because he injected manipulation into the question itself. So when the professor tries to say that, of course, then it puts him under pressure. The professor is smart enough to catch that, and it isn’t that simple. And he understands. The professor knew, of course, what I’m telling you right now. However, time is ticking. He only has so much time on the air, and their job is to disrupt his thinking as much as possible and make as many hidden accusations as they can, and as many subconscious embeds into how to perceive the professor as they can in the short amount of time that he’s on the air. And that’s their only job, is to discredit and disrupt. Okay. But he did catch it. Now he has to respond to that rather than being able to say anything that matters. And that’s what they do. Another good person at this is Stephen Colbert. If you watch Stephen Colbert with any of his interviews, his whole job is to discredit and disrupt. That’s what he does. And you keep it moving. It’s very, very petty. But these are the people that you allow to run you okay? So know that. And that’s what’s going on right here.
Hannity: Yes or no?
Kevin Barrett: It’s not quite that simple. I do know, I don’t believe I know that 9/11 was an inside job. Professor Steven Jones has found residue of thermite on the steel samples from the World Trade Center. We now know that it was taken down in a controlled demolition.
Hannity: So you believe that the buildings came down in a controlled demolition.
Jonathan Adampants: Okay, so the professor did a really good job of identifying his manipulation by saying, I don’t believe I know. And because he was starting to get through that, Hannity interrupts him and says, I don’t have a lot of time. Well, wait a minute. You just asked him a question and now he’s able to break through your manipulation and suddenly you don’t have a lot of time for the very answer to the question that you just asked. The next thing you see, he asks him what evidence does he have? And he interrupted him, giving the evidence to ask him what evidence he has. Why, of course, he’s not interested in hearing the evidence or anybody else hearing it. He’s interested in interrupting him, implanting another embed into the psyche that what he happens to be saying right now is somehow not evidence. It’s all misdirection of focus, redirection of focus, disrupting, interrupting, gaining control. And, you know, it’s this very petty. They they rely on these petty techniques. Now, at the end of this, he does something that a lot of you probably aren’t aware of. He does a hand gesture, he takes both of his hands, and he puts them up in front of his head and then pulls them down, and he pretends he’s talking about the buildings falling down. What that is, is I don’t know what they would term it. I’m just intuitive. I’m perceptive. I can see what they’re doing. That’s sorcery. Sorcery is just anything that is used to circumvent the conscious mind, to control the mind. That gesture is designed to take away his zest, his focus, his power. By bringing his hands down like that, he’s trying to subconsciously take away the focus of the professor, take away his power, and that’s exactly what he’s doing. And that’s what you’re seeing. And I’ll play that again for you.
Kevin Barrett: An inside job. Professor Stephen Jones has found residue of thermate on the steel samples from the World Trade Center. We now know that it was taken down in a controlled demolition.
Hannity: So you believe that the buildings came down in a controlled demolition?
Kevin Barrett: Well, I don’t believe it. I’ve looked at the evidence and the evidence is overwhelming.
Hannity: All right. The evidence is overwhelming to you because you’re a conspiracy nut.
Kevin Barrett: I ask your viewers to take...
Jonathan Adampants: Okay. Now, in this one, I’m sure you caught the obvious part, but you probably did not catch the Neuro-linguistic programming. What exactly is Neuro-linguistic programming? Simply put, it’s dual meaning that is speaking to the subconscious. Now, of course, he’s shaping public opinion by saying “it’s obvious to you because you are a conspiracy nut.” Well, remember now people are very phobic of being called anything that goes against the norm. So if you agree with him, oh, then you’re a nut. And people, you know, they can’t escape their own ego. So that’s used to shape him. What you probably didn’t catch is him saying “but you know, putting that all aside.” This is neuro-linguistic programming. Now pay attention here. “You’re a conspiracy nut. But putting that all aside...” What that is doing is he’s directing your subconscious mind and your conscious mind to store that label, that impression of him. Put it aside. Keep that. It’s called anchoring in neurolinguistic programming, because I’ve watched a little bit of it. I didn’t need to watch it to pick up on how they do this, but it allows you to get some of their terminology down. They call this anchoring. Anchoring a thought, anchoring a concept, anchoring a feeling. Putting all of that aside means put that aside in your mind. He’s a conspiracy nut. Do you see how they manipulate you? That’s a very good lesson right there in Neurolinguistic programming.
Hannity: All the evidence is overwhelming to you because you’re conspiracy nut.
Kevin Barrett: I ask your viewers to take a look at this evidence for themselves. They can go to STJ911.org. That’s scholars for 9/11 truth. Take a look. Take a look at the demolition. Morgan Reynolds, the former Bush administration official...
Jonathan Adampants: Okay, that’s pretty obvious. You see how he’s treating him? Very nonchalant, irritated, bored. “And I know you think you’re the smartest guy in the world.” This is, you know, the typical “you’re a know it all” type of comment. If you watch that David Icke video where he goes back on Rogan, he draws attention to the same thing where he said, whoa, that’s a cheap shot. When he said, “you know it all.” And the response was accurate. I’m not saying I know at all, but people are trained to hate people who, quote, know it all. Why? Because they want you to be dumb. That’s why in society, you have catchphrases that go around that people use. Like “you think too much, you’re too deep. You know it all.” These have all become derogatory terms in this new Orwellian society. Haven’t you noticed that? His response is petty and childish, but he means to be this way. It does nothing. It addresses nothing. He can’t think of anything to say in response to the professor. So he has to take a cheap shot like this. I know you think you’re the smartest guy in the world. That should be obvious to you that that is just overdoing it. Creating, manifesting an insult. Just again, for one reason and one reason only, to disrupt his thinking and to program your mind on how to view him.
Kevin Barrett: Look, take a look at the at the demolition. Morgan Reynolds, the former Bush administration official, says that the Bush administration “blew the World Trade Center to kingdom come.” That’s a direct quote from a member of the Bush administration itself.
Hannity: I know.
Kevin Barrett: “Blew the World Trade Center to kingdom come.”
Hannity: Jews were told to leave. We’ve heard a lot of these sick, bizarre theories.
Jonathan Adampants: That’s okay. So suddenly he’s an anti-Semite. When did that come about? I didn’t hear him say anything about the Jews. What Hannity’s doing here is he’s trying to link him to anti-Semitism. That’s what they want to do. Now, anybody that’s really trying to speak the truth in this world has no interest in focusing on a group or even an individual. What they try to focus on is the problem in general, outside of any group or individual that may be manifesting the symptoms of the problem. But again, what he’s trying to do here is, in your mind, link the professor to being part of a hate group, someone that’s going to target a group or an individual and make you link the terms “sick” and “bizarre” to the professor. He didn’t say anything about the Jewish community. Nothing. So catch that. See how he’s trying to link the professor to it.
Kevin Barrett: “Blew the World Trade Center to kingdom come.” That’s a direct quote from a member of the Bush administration itself. “Blew the World Trade Center to kingdom come.”
Hannity: Jews were told to leave. We’ve heard a lot of these sick, bizarre theories. I don’t believe any of them. But you’re allowed to believe what you want. But that’s not what’s at hand here.
Jonathan Adampants: Okay, now another thing, just to make you aware again of just how much they’re programming your mind. To you, it looks like a man that said, “that’s not the issue at hand here.” You need to start learning their language. Their language is dual meaning, which goes hand in hand with neuro linguistic programming. The issue at hand here, what he’s doing, is directing the professor to look at his hand. Now, why would he have the professor look at his hand? Well, if you look at his hand right now, you see, it is what you’ve been told is the okay sign, right? Well, let’s show you what it really means. The okay symbol, as you see right here, means six, six, six. For some reason, 666 has some sort of control over the mind. Now it could have something to do with the beast computers many of you have read about. It’s sorcery. It is putting a hex on somebody. It is subconscious symbolism that somehow affects some people. It doesn’t affect everybody. But he’s using that. And he was directing the professor to look at his hand to use sorcery on him.
It’s not that one thing will work. They try to use as many combinations of things as they can, but that is a symbol and it means 666. And that is why he told him to look at his hand or the issue at hand here. Told his mind subconsciously to look at his hand. Do you see? And that is what just occurred there. That’s not what’s at hand here. Meaning you are not allowed to believe what you want. And that also tells the population looking at him. Because remember, he is also talking to people that are watching television. And so they are also instructed to look at his hand subconsciously or take notice of it subconsciously. And when he says, you’re allowed to believe what you want, but that’s not what’s at hand here, he’s saying, with the six, six, six rule over your mind, you are not allowed to believe what you want. And that speaks to your subconscious mind and programs people to not think. And that’s what it means all around and all together. That’s what just happened.
Hannity: But you’re allowed to believe what you want. But that’s not what’s at hand here. The issue is, is whether or not you with your bizarre theories are the best—
Kevin Barrett: I think you have the bizarre theory. You think it was 19 guys with boxcutters...
Jonathan Adampants: Okay, again, saying his issues, his views are bizarre, right? But the reason he puts up his pinky there is because that is the weakest finger. That would imply a small penis, not a potent man. Using that in reference to him saying that he is impotent, that he is bizarre, that he is weak, and that he is of the pinky. And that’s why he chooses of all fingers and all gestures to speak about his theories, he puts his pinky up. And these are all subconscious sorcery methods. Again, sorcery is not some guy wearing a magician’s hat. Part of sorcery is speaking to and manipulating the conscious mind from the subconscious.
Kevin Barrett: It’s a question of science.
Hannity: ...whether or not you, with your bizarre theories are the best—
Kevin Barrett: I think you have the bizarre theory. You think it was 19 guys with box cutters led by a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan. That’s ridiculous. I mean, that’s the craziest conspiracy theory of all of them.
Hannity: Okay. I wish I had the Twilight Zone music. Now here’s my next...
Jonathan Adampants: See, all he can say is something to discredit him. “I wish I had the Twilight Zone music,” and then the people watching the televisions that say, “yes, that must be weird. Twilight zone music is weird, and the the honest and credible news reporters saying that about him.” Okay, now you see that all the neuro linguistic programming is starting to get to the professor. He’s starting to screw up his words. He’s starting to screw up his concentration. He’s mispronouncing. That’s because there’s a lot of negative energy being focused on him, interrupting his thought process. So you can see how he’s starting to screw up his words, but he’s still, with all of that working against him and being unaware of those techniques, he still holds his own, but you start to see it get to him a little bit.
Kevin Barrett: I mean, that’s the craziest conspiracy theory of all of them.
Hannity: Okay, I wish I had the Twilight Zone music. Now here’s my next question. The issue is at hand here. You’re entitled to have your opinion. I don’t really care what you believe, but if we’re talking about a captive group of students in a classroom.
Jonathan Adampants: Again, making a bored face as if he’s nothing, he’s the pinky. He’s lower than low. I really don’t care what you believe, but if we’re talking about a captive group of students, okay, first he he said that they implied that he wants the students to regurgitate. Now he’s holding them captive, which goes hand in hand with what? Terrorism hostages. He’s subconsciously painting this professor to be...what, a terrorist. So not only have they discredited him, but people are already getting in their minds that with this neuro linguistic programming, that’s. Now you understand what neuro linguistic programming is neuro brain linguistics, speech programming, programming, the brain with speech via the subconscious, dual meaning.
Hannity: I don’t really care what you believe, but if we’re talking about a captive group of students in a classroom—
Kevin Barrett: I’m not going to hold them captive!
Hannity: Hang on a second. Well, they’re sitting in your classroom and you have a position of authority. I’m wondering what the question is, whether or not you’re the most competent to teach them. And most people think you’re a nut.
Jonathan Adampants: Now, this one should be obvious, isn’t he? A person that’s in a position of authority. And isn’t he about as incompetent as you can get? As far as love and honesty and caring about other life forms. Yet he turns it around because people believe what they hear and what they read. So if he says it first, and that’s a big part of this, he is trying to say things first before somebody else can say something. Then it seems like they will always be on the defensive. And that’s the whole point, is to keep the professor on the defensive. All right. And saying that he is detrimental to his students when the truth is, Fox News is incredibly detrimental to you. Just in this short clip I’m showing you here, and people are watching this all day long.
Hannity: And most people think you’re a nut. Most people think—
Kevin Barrett: Actually, no, they don’t. We just had a poll here in Madison, and we found that 90% of the respondents at Channel 3000 poll said that I should be allowed to teach. Only 10% said I shouldn’t. That’s the question. 90%!
Hannity: I don’t think—
Kevin Barrett: And 60% agreed with me about the questions I’m raising about 9/11. 60% of the respondents. I think you’re in the minority.
Hannity: I don’t think this is the proper forum, though, for people that hold extremist views like yourself.
Jonathan Adampants: Okay, first of all, when he says no, no, like that, what he’s doing is he’s programming the television viewers’ collective consciousness to disregard the results of that poll. He says, no, no. And then your mind says no to the information he just gave. These are just little tricks he slips in there: “and most people think he’s a nut.” What? But see, people watch that, of course, and they store that in their mind as fact. Of course, most people do not think he is a nut. But if he says that, he programs anybody watching this television program hint, hint that “everybody thinks he’s a nut. So I will try to fit in.” Where did he get that number? How does he know? Most people think that he’s a nut. Think about it. They don’t. He just says it. And then the professor has to respond to that. He’s totally disrupting the whole interview. So it appears to people, because time is moving by, that there’s actually an interview going on here, but it’s not. It’s only about disrupting and discrediting and programming your opinion. Okay. First of all, I used to live in Madison, Wisconsin, and I can tell you that people did not think that he was crazy. It was the television that began to program people to think that he was crazy. Again, now, “extremist views like yourself.” Now, they already set the stage in your mind or the viewers mind before he brought that up. In the beginning, when that first reporter took his hands and whipped them over to the left side of his shoulder to subconsciously say that he’s an extreme leftist. He’s on the extreme left. So now they’re reinforcing that, telling you to believe that he is extremist, that these are extreme things. Well, Fox is six, six, six. I mean, just look. Look what they’re doing. Look what I’m pointing out to you. Once you start to understand the dual meaning of neurolinguistic programming, things become crystal clear to you.
Kevin Barrett: ...about the questions I’m raising about 9/11. 60% of the respondents! I think you’re in the minority.
Hannity: I don’t think this is the proper forum, though for people that hold extremist views like yourself. Reasonable people—
Jonathan Adampants: “Reasonable people.” Now notice what he did there. He took his hands and he gestured them towards himself and said, “reasonable people” while pointing to himself. Therefore, your subconscious and your conscious mind is shaped to see Sean Hannity as the reasonable person. They’re always using gestures against you in coordination with dual meaning in things they say to direct meaning. So again, reasonable people, all he has to do is point to himself. And that’s a subtle non-verbal gesture to make you associate being reasonable with Sean Hannity’s point of view. He’s programming your mind. So now, after you have associated being reasonable with Sean Hannity, and when he says “people think” he points out or opens his hands. So you are to think, see, “reasonable people.” He points to himself and then opens it up to, you think you shouldn’t be allowed to teach this class? We can do a better job. People will be programmed by that.
Kevin Barrett: You guys are extremist. Fox News is the biggest bunch of extremists on the planet.
Hannity: Reasonable people see you as an extremist, and I don’t think you’re the most appropriate guy to teach that class. My, my guess is—
Kevin Barrett: I don’t think you’re the most appropriate guy to be on the airwaves spewing your venom.
Jonathan Adampants: And the professor got it right. You can see the look on his face. He says, “spewing your venom.” That’s exactly what he’s doing. The problem is that you can’t get all of this out in an interview. For example, say I was on an interview like this. They would be doing all the same things to me. All I would be doing is calling attention to everything he’s doing, and then he would sit there and argue with me. Nothing would ever get discussed. This is how they take advantage of people. Look how long it’s taken me. Do you know this clip is only like two minutes long normally? But just to describe two very short minutes of media to you, look how long this is taking. That’s the problem. That’s why I haven’t done it before. Because I can sit here and explain it to you. But you need to open up your eyes so you can see it for yourself, because it all happens way too quickly. If you try to explain something that happens in a three second period, if you’re not educated on that, if you’re not aware of it, it will go by way too fast before you can bring somebody up to speed to understand what’s going on. This is why I had to break it down for you. But I still can’t do this with everything I see because this is everywhere. This is common. This is always going on. And it just you need to educate yourself, but you need to become aware again. Dual meaning neuro-linguistic programming, gesturing association of concepts and beliefs to link them, anchor them in your mind to misdirect your perception, your beliefs, and your ability to perceive reality in general.
Kevin Barrett: I don’t think you’re the most appropriate guy to be on the airwaves spewing your venom. I think you guys should be taken off the airwaves.
Hannity: Because you want to silence the conservatives.
Colmes: We don’t want to silence anybody. You teach, we’ll do Hannity and Colmes. Thank you. Professor.
Jonathan Adampants: “We don’t want to silence anybody.” That’s exactly what they have just done. Though you heard a lot of speaking going on, nothing was able to get out into the open. They completely took control of this poor man. And he’s brave, okay, to get out there, lose his job and to speak the truth. And they hound him like bees. They’re using techniques that are hidden, that are sorcery, they’re of sorcery in their nature. They’re hypnotic. They’re using negative energy, manipulative techniques, childish argument techniques. And so you’ve seen a lot of talking, but nothing got out into the open. And you see how nervous they made him. Why? Because he had to keep dealing with their techniques and he couldn’t express the truth. And this is how anybody who tries to get on the media to speak the truth is manipulated. And that’s why most don’t even bother. They don’t bother, because they would just get into an argument. I mean, what’s the point? The expert that I’ve seen at this is Stephen Colbert. He was one of the biggest disinformation agents out there. He’ll get somebody in for an interview and just completely distract, disrupt, discredit. And there is no interview. That’s what I call Stephen Colbert’s interviews. They’re not interviews. They’re Stephen Colbert using techniques to distract and discombobulate, basically. So this is why you don’t get the truth in the media. Even if people do get a chance at airtime, they will be interrupted, misdirected, hypnotic suggestions to the audience that are watching it. People that know the truth won’t even try. They won’t even try to go on the mainstream media and people that do, it ends up like this. So until that is addressed, then nothing will ever be told on mainstream media. But what you can learn from this: Don’t watch TV. Okay? I hope this helps.
