I just can't stop reading u...Kevin your Collaborative interjections are not off the mark at all.Reverse propaganda..chaos and false flagging has always kept the hypnotic spell of misinformation for the zionist agenda.Anything that benefits the Lie..is open to abuse.thx u Kevin for en enlightening proposition.
Who gains? Certainly not Muslims. Israel being a product of distrust of outsiders, irony itself, would stand to gain but for how long? Islam has been traditionally painted as a pack of violent extremists and the attack on SR pkays into it for sure. You might be right Kevin. How do we find out?
You are always demonizing liberal secular humanism the same way Islamaphobes demonize Islam. It doesn't help your argument, so I suggest you stop doing it. Your suspicion that Israel is behind the Rushdie attack is quite plausible otherwise.
You have no evidence that "Western self-styled human rights advocates" are secular humanists. I suspect they are mostly Christians and Jews.
Religion is a patriarchal authoritarian mind-control system.
From the moment it happened I thought, how could security have been so lax as to let a knife wielding assailant access to Rushdie's personal space? A rifle shot wouldn't have been so obvious, but the ineptitude protecting his physical being is beyond believable. I agree, the Zionist entity with its gore is the most likely suspect.
I just can't stop reading u...Kevin your Collaborative interjections are not off the mark at all.Reverse propaganda..chaos and false flagging has always kept the hypnotic spell of misinformation for the zionist agenda.Anything that benefits the Lie..is open to abuse.thx u Kevin for en enlightening proposition.
Who gains? Certainly not Muslims. Israel being a product of distrust of outsiders, irony itself, would stand to gain but for how long? Islam has been traditionally painted as a pack of violent extremists and the attack on SR pkays into it for sure. You might be right Kevin. How do we find out?
Hey Kevin,
You are always demonizing liberal secular humanism the same way Islamaphobes demonize Islam. It doesn't help your argument, so I suggest you stop doing it. Your suspicion that Israel is behind the Rushdie attack is quite plausible otherwise.
You have no evidence that "Western self-styled human rights advocates" are secular humanists. I suspect they are mostly Christians and Jews.
Religion is a patriarchal authoritarian mind-control system.
From the moment it happened I thought, how could security have been so lax as to let a knife wielding assailant access to Rushdie's personal space? A rifle shot wouldn't have been so obvious, but the ineptitude protecting his physical being is beyond believable. I agree, the Zionist entity with its gore is the most likely suspect.