There's no Zionism without the Khazarian name-thieving fake Jews of Ukraine.
None of this is possible without the satanic supremacism and psychopathic world view of Talmudic Judaism.
There’s nothing wrong about being “antisemitic" literally every culture on earth for all the recorded history has been as a means of self-defence against the ruthless international clique.
It’s not an understatement just perhaps one of the single most unifying things about the human experiences that they fucking hate the Khazarian mafia and their civilian-slaying child-fucking ways.
Zionists are really Sabbotean Frankists seeking redemption through sin. They believe that when all good is inverted to evil that their messiah will return.
My pet conspiracy theory is this cruel inhuman behaviour is the result of remnant neanderthal genes in the N Caspian populace. Its dagestani khabibs have been tempered by Islam and the Quran, but still aggressive enough to win at UFC/MMC. Whilst the other remaining khazar tribes who have taken up judaism, with their inveterate satanyahu type lying, hagari big ears and cuomo funeral faces, have become even more inhuman under talmudic/old testament scripture? And Al-Hasib (aka Mr CoznEffect) does catch up with them from time to time, whether it's an English King in 1290 or a General Ulysses Grant in Kentucky. After Gaza genocide a correction must be imminent and the wary are taking the samsonite option before a samson option occurs and telaviv is glassed by Russki.
I really appreciate this analysis, but I imagine a simpler explanation: the Zionists are simply carrying out the project described in the old testament, where their God promised them not only the region which now comprises "Israel" but all of the territory from the Euphrates to the Nile, which includes parts of Egypt, Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and all of Jordan. The ethno supramacism and hate of the other is all codified and justified there, as demonstrated in Laurent Guyenot's works on the topic. It easily explains the psychopathy. If one approaches the text as one would any work of ancient myth literature (without the orthodox a priori assumptions made by those of Abrahamic faiths) I think similar conclusions would be reached and not their opposites ("God is love"). So in short the Jewish settler colonists are enacting the program put forth in their self serving myth literature. Their colonialism is downstream of their myths. They are wiping out all that breathes and Amalek. No need to refer to obscure leaders like Maimodies or Zevi, who drew from the same well of literature, though they did perhaps refine and energize certain ideas.
What an absolutely clear and concise history and analysis, Kevin, from a theological, psychological and sociological view. I'll be referring back to this anytime someone needs to catch up in a hurry. And loved seeing Ron Unz quoted here, I'd read those in full and they're brilliant.
A truly horrific summary and analyses of events. Thank you for not letting go and keeping your audience informed about these wrongdoings. Nevertheless, I would need to leave you with a suggestion regarding the wording used in your article (being somewhat of a puritan in that respect: words have meaning).
Your article mentions: gang-raping a Palestinian hostage, right to rape, pro-rape protesters, rape-loving rioters etcetera, under the common denominator of sexual violence.
I want to make something clear: whatever that was done to these poor victims is not to be considered sexual violence. It may be considered as such by the perpetrators, but such an interpretation should under no condition be projected on their victims. Men cannot be raped, unless it is done by a very powerful woman, force-feeding her victim Viagra before the attack.
Calling injury and/or death by anal penetration rape, is playing into the cards of a specific group of people that fully rejects the functional sexual characteristics of this creation. Our sexual urges being there for one purpose, and one purpose only: procreation. Whatever this wholly disconnected group of people do with and to each other is not to be regarded sexual in any way (it is simply depraved).
We should be very careful not to nurture the concept of non-procreational physical acts as either sexual or natural. It both places the future of our pretty decent physical design at risk, and with respect to the torture epidemic in Palestine, would even risk burdening the surviving victims with extra mental problems (if they would start adhere to the idea something sexually had been done to them).
As a woman, I define rape as an act of violence, not sex. So I'd differ with you on putting rape within the category of sex, simply because it's related to procreation, rather than in the category of simply violence. Anal gang rape with a stick is as violent as it gets and vaginal rape of women has nothing in common with the word 'sexual' and everything to do with violence. So I guess I'd reject both as 'sexual violence' and just call them violence.
I wonder if your goy anus would agree with your intellectual acrobatics after a genocidal supremacist jail guard squad treats it as a communal flashlight, or a toddler in a chabad tunnel.
To start: my humble apologies to Dr. Barrett; for me polluting this thread with potential profanities.
As for you Mr. Gumbley: if you would rather prefer experiencing (i.e. interpreting) a flashlight, acrobatically getting hammered into your butthole as something sexual being afflicted to you ( in stead of noticing you are tortured in the most horrible way), you are of course free to do so.
The whole point of our previous chat merely implied that such torture should not be mass-programmed to be understood as such (i.e. something sexual).
Ironically wop pimpeo and the 70m Southern baptists, say the above sos will be a returned Jesus' (pbuh) second target after slaying the anti-christ (satanyahu?) at Lod. Then only a Kingdom of Heaven on earth will arise. Will He also slay the cryptos, the joelosteens and hagis who have infiltrated the Southern Baptist Church?
Excellent article and a great summation of the problem. The truth will eventually prevail and the Mosodomites will be brought to justice, and will be returned to hell where they belong. Redemption by death!
I'm not Muslim, but I am compelled to pick up a rifle and go over there and kill all of these Israelis, if I could. I can't imagine every Muslim on earth doesn't feel the same way. Given what Kevin has described. I gree, there will never be peace in Israel until every Jew is expelled. from Palestine. The practice of colonialism is dead. Long live the Palestinians!
There's no Zionism without the Khazarian name-thieving fake Jews of Ukraine.
None of this is possible without the satanic supremacism and psychopathic world view of Talmudic Judaism.
There’s nothing wrong about being “antisemitic" literally every culture on earth for all the recorded history has been as a means of self-defence against the ruthless international clique.
It’s not an understatement just perhaps one of the single most unifying things about the human experiences that they fucking hate the Khazarian mafia and their civilian-slaying child-fucking ways.
🎯
Thanks for explaining this complex history so clearly.
There are many Jews like me who are totally the opposite of the Zionists you describe, how tragic a depraved minority gives Judaism a bad name!
Zionists are really Sabbotean Frankists seeking redemption through sin. They believe that when all good is inverted to evil that their messiah will return.
My pet conspiracy theory is this cruel inhuman behaviour is the result of remnant neanderthal genes in the N Caspian populace. Its dagestani khabibs have been tempered by Islam and the Quran, but still aggressive enough to win at UFC/MMC. Whilst the other remaining khazar tribes who have taken up judaism, with their inveterate satanyahu type lying, hagari big ears and cuomo funeral faces, have become even more inhuman under talmudic/old testament scripture? And Al-Hasib (aka Mr CoznEffect) does catch up with them from time to time, whether it's an English King in 1290 or a General Ulysses Grant in Kentucky. After Gaza genocide a correction must be imminent and the wary are taking the samsonite option before a samson option occurs and telaviv is glassed by Russki.
The Khazar hypothesis remains unconvincing to me.
I'm not convinced either. But you have to admit Iqbal's description is evocative and even kind of poetic.
I really appreciate this analysis, but I imagine a simpler explanation: the Zionists are simply carrying out the project described in the old testament, where their God promised them not only the region which now comprises "Israel" but all of the territory from the Euphrates to the Nile, which includes parts of Egypt, Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and all of Jordan. The ethno supramacism and hate of the other is all codified and justified there, as demonstrated in Laurent Guyenot's works on the topic. It easily explains the psychopathy. If one approaches the text as one would any work of ancient myth literature (without the orthodox a priori assumptions made by those of Abrahamic faiths) I think similar conclusions would be reached and not their opposites ("God is love"). So in short the Jewish settler colonists are enacting the program put forth in their self serving myth literature. Their colonialism is downstream of their myths. They are wiping out all that breathes and Amalek. No need to refer to obscure leaders like Maimodies or Zevi, who drew from the same well of literature, though they did perhaps refine and energize certain ideas.
What an absolutely clear and concise history and analysis, Kevin, from a theological, psychological and sociological view. I'll be referring back to this anytime someone needs to catch up in a hurry. And loved seeing Ron Unz quoted here, I'd read those in full and they're brilliant.
Read Ilan Pappe’s new book “Lobbying for Zio ism on Both Sudes of the Atlantic “ to learn why this sort of thing is allowed to continue in silence
Thank you. Pappe's other works have been most informative. No wonder he was arrested in Detroit.
An absolute masterpiece of writing, summing of the situation precisely. I’ll be sharing this around. Thanks, Dr. B
Hello Dr. Barrett,
A truly horrific summary and analyses of events. Thank you for not letting go and keeping your audience informed about these wrongdoings. Nevertheless, I would need to leave you with a suggestion regarding the wording used in your article (being somewhat of a puritan in that respect: words have meaning).
Your article mentions: gang-raping a Palestinian hostage, right to rape, pro-rape protesters, rape-loving rioters etcetera, under the common denominator of sexual violence.
I want to make something clear: whatever that was done to these poor victims is not to be considered sexual violence. It may be considered as such by the perpetrators, but such an interpretation should under no condition be projected on their victims. Men cannot be raped, unless it is done by a very powerful woman, force-feeding her victim Viagra before the attack.
Calling injury and/or death by anal penetration rape, is playing into the cards of a specific group of people that fully rejects the functional sexual characteristics of this creation. Our sexual urges being there for one purpose, and one purpose only: procreation. Whatever this wholly disconnected group of people do with and to each other is not to be regarded sexual in any way (it is simply depraved).
We should be very careful not to nurture the concept of non-procreational physical acts as either sexual or natural. It both places the future of our pretty decent physical design at risk, and with respect to the torture epidemic in Palestine, would even risk burdening the surviving victims with extra mental problems (if they would start adhere to the idea something sexually had been done to them).
Robbert Biben, B.Sc.
Consultant | Scribe | Innovator
I see your point, but it fits the legal definition of rape, and since we don't have an even worse word to apply to it, I'm kind of stuck.
As a woman, I define rape as an act of violence, not sex. So I'd differ with you on putting rape within the category of sex, simply because it's related to procreation, rather than in the category of simply violence. Anal gang rape with a stick is as violent as it gets and vaginal rape of women has nothing in common with the word 'sexual' and everything to do with violence. So I guess I'd reject both as 'sexual violence' and just call them violence.
I agree, Tereza. Rape is a subcategory of assault (and sometimes of torture) not of sex.
I wonder if your goy anus would agree with your intellectual acrobatics after a genocidal supremacist jail guard squad treats it as a communal flashlight, or a toddler in a chabad tunnel.
🙄
To start: my humble apologies to Dr. Barrett; for me polluting this thread with potential profanities.
As for you Mr. Gumbley: if you would rather prefer experiencing (i.e. interpreting) a flashlight, acrobatically getting hammered into your butthole as something sexual being afflicted to you ( in stead of noticing you are tortured in the most horrible way), you are of course free to do so.
The whole point of our previous chat merely implied that such torture should not be mass-programmed to be understood as such (i.e. something sexual).
Many thanks for your remarks,
Kind regards,
Robbert
I'm not saying that and you know well.
I'm saying your tune might change if you were (God forbid) subject to such bestial violence yourself.
Rape is about power and subjugation. The orifice vector of abuse is really just a detail.
If it were about procreation on any level you wouldn't have such a prevalence of Rape victims beaten and or raped to death...
And if a man were raped in the mouth using a penis, wouldn't that be sexual rape?
Thank you. First article that explains all this disgusting madness so clearly and convincingly.
Ashkenazi population distribution:
Europe - 6 million
US - 6 million
Israel- 6 million
Put it all together into one number…
Ironically wop pimpeo and the 70m Southern baptists, say the above sos will be a returned Jesus' (pbuh) second target after slaying the anti-christ (satanyahu?) at Lod. Then only a Kingdom of Heaven on earth will arise. Will He also slay the cryptos, the joelosteens and hagis who have infiltrated the Southern Baptist Church?
!!! إنشاء ألله
🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞
Please translate.
Hopefully or so God will
Excellent article and a great summation of the problem. The truth will eventually prevail and the Mosodomites will be brought to justice, and will be returned to hell where they belong. Redemption by death!
I'm not Muslim, but I am compelled to pick up a rifle and go over there and kill all of these Israelis, if I could. I can't imagine every Muslim on earth doesn't feel the same way. Given what Kevin has described. I gree, there will never be peace in Israel until every Jew is expelled. from Palestine. The practice of colonialism is dead. Long live the Palestinians!
Exodus 2.0 to southern Ukraine now starting to board the train.