2 Comments

Time to lock up the Zebrews. Washington Post Letters to the Editor full of Jew complaints they they are being unfairly singled out for paying to shut down genocide protests. Claimed groups other than the Eternal Victims were paying for their own projects

Expand full comment

Kevin...

Great interview! Probably one of your best yet.

A few notes...

One, Zionism has nothing to do with business. It never has and never will. Whatever business opportunities arise out of this pathology is simply a result of its implementation.

Two, Zionism is a violent sociopathology that from its inception in the early 19th century has more recently attempted to rewrite facets of the Jewish religion to be something it never was. Nonetheless, the early Zionists, also known as proto-Zionists never had any intention of creating a state or subjugating the existing inhabitants of Palestine. They were merely interested in living within the holy land in harmony with whatever and whoever already lived there.

This being said, the majority of Jews today who believe they believe in Judaism actually believe in the Talmudic interpretation of this belief system, not the actual religion itself.

Those who still follow the original tenets of this religion would be following the Keraite Jewish view of the religion.

Three... Though I agree with your views on RFK Jr., the idea that we have been left with only 3 presidential candidate choices in November is not true. In fact, we do have Dr. Jill Stein who is as vociferously against the Jewish state and our funding of it as RFK Jr. is for it.

Once RFK Jr. opened his moth on Ukraine and Israel, he lost large swathes of voters. And like you said, he has become an after thought.

However, Jill Stein, I do believe, if she is elected (and she actually has a better chance of this than most believe), will provide some major relief to the American populace on a host of issues.

Finally, may I suggest that you and others who are supportive of the student protesting this current Israeli genocide, provide them with the following information...

Student protesters do not have to accept being beaten and harmed by police. Though I would never suggest that they attack police officers they can surely defend themselves from such violence by using a very simple, ancient tactics called the "shield wall".

A "shield wall" is comprised of front-line troops who raise their shields in overlapping fashion to protect themselves from enemy swords and missile fire (ie: arrows).

Students can create such a defense by creating standard Roman shields (aka... scutum) and learn how to use them in formation. Here is a link that provides instructions on how to build an actual, wooden Roman shield... http://www.fectio.org.uk/articles/makescutum.htm

There is nothing here that poses a danger to police officers except for the frustration of facing a more formal wall of resistance. Interested students could learn how to use such shields as weapons (which I don't recommend) in the same fashion as the Romans did. However, wielding such a shield properly could provide a lot of harm to an attacker...

Expand full comment