I never had heard of Charlie Kirk before he was purportedly "gunned down". It has now been exposed that Erica Kirk's mother had long standing relations and influence with various governmental agencies. Since I never looked into TPSA or any of their connections ...it all seems quite strange. I suppose that it is entirely possibly he WAS gunned down. If so then I am sure the perps had various octopus like reasons. Celia Farber has written interesting observations about Erika Kirk's mother.
Charlie didn’t die that day. No funeral was held, there was no ballistics analysis, there was no blood splatter behind him, there is no autopsy, his fake hands in the casket, his wife’s fake tears and acting job, the crime scene was not locked down, there was no air support for a shooter on the loose, the crime scene was covered up with concrete and destroyed, the shooter would be visible by a security team, there was no ambulance, there was no blood trail to the SUV, etc. The bottom line is Charlie was a controlled shill and I think he pretended to go against Israel as part of the cover story to be used to take him out. He was losing debates to flunky college stoners on the Israel and jewish issues so that had to be stopped. Remember our jewish masters want people to be angry with jews so they can get antisemitism legislation passed. That’s the ultimate goal and it indeed did pass in the house in 2024 and sits with the senate currently. They will continue the fake pograms until we get imprisoned for speaking truth about these demons.
A much more compelling motive is that Kirk was actively working against "Israel's" strategic interest when it came to Iran, by moderating Trump's response against what "Israel" wanted, which cost "Israel" dearly, as well moderating Trump on the Ukraine issue, also a Zionist strategic ambition. Trump has a shelf life that he was paid well by the ziocons to implement their strategic interest, and Kirk was ticking it down against them.
One could even go as far to say that taking Kirk out would have been a strategic imperative, as well the rest of the alleged influencers that was supporting him in that influence. And we can see that neutralization continue, and certainly those at the top of the list, need to keep frosty (is there any other way?).
I'm surprised nobody else is talking about this much more likely motive, not that the lessor sins wasn't enough to get him whacked, but when it comes to the little gangster state's strategic ambitions, the stepping stones are measured as vast multitude of bodies.
The kirk mishap was likely as much a message to Trump as anyone else, stay bought or else. When it comes to that betrayal of trust regarding their strategic imperatives, it becomes personal, and we all know they aren't the forgiving gangster types.
It doesn't so far appear to matter how much forensic evidence there is 'post mortem', dis-proving the official narratives. Once that official account has been posted and nailed to the door, with all it's authority system adherents and media enablers pulled into line 'corroborating' the psyop; then it's a done deal. Nothing seems to penetrate that titanium firewall between later exposed truths, and the original lie.
The Christchurch Mosque attack is a recent example, where a 1m18sec iphone clip clearly shows the staging of the secondary attack at the Linwood Community Centre; right down to an old fellow being directed to play dead; which he comfortably does; only to get up and wander casually off for a cup of tea at the end of it. But nothing shifted: nothing changed in the official narratives to account for this clear evidence of staging. The dataset didn't exist because media and the judiciary never saw it and if they did, they didn't report it.
And we all know, if it is not reported, it didn't happen.
There's a vid showing a khaki-uniformed man standing right in front of Kirk, only the fence between them. He points to Kirk with a palm-pistol, barrel between his fingers and triggers ...
Images of this device are to be found publicly.
Another vid with the same person from behind, assisting when Kirk was dragged to a vehicle and the round bulge from the palm-pistol shows in his rear pocket.
Only time will tell, but as things look, the currently living will never know ...
Maybe, a deeper search for Alexis Wilkins, Patel's current girl friend could uncover some more details. She's being accused of being a Mossad-asset ...
SANS AUTOPSIES and BALLISTIC REPORTS, WE ARE HAMSTRUNG, BUT WE CAN INFER SOME THINGS RE: THE ASSASSINATION OF MR. CHARLIE KIRK
I find Dr. Martenson's analysis very engaging and worthwhile, indeed. Prior to his, I provided my own based on my experience, not as a marksman (which I am not), but having experience teaching cadaver anatomy and being a little bit handy with physics. See here,
"FIRST FACT: Charlie Kirk couldn't have been killed by a .30-06 round from the Losee Center rooftop. Now things gets interesting: government, captured organizational or private involvement seem likely."
I offer a hypothesis that diverges from Dr. Martenson's. I do not believe the additional angle of elevation that he presumes can explain a sufficient deflection of the bullet that is consistent with what we've been told. This latter point is the obstacle. We do not have an autopsy report nor an x-ray study of Mr. Kirk's body postmortem. Put simply, the ballistics involved, as the government has told us as established fact, cannot account for the recorded pressure waves dynamically distorting the skull of the victim, nor the extensive vertebral damage and described involvement of the elements thereof, nor the lack of exit wounds or, alternatively--if we are to believe the claim of a bullet captured within the victim's body--the lack of backward thrust of the body in response to the sizable momentum of the alleged missile.
It turns out that in the the U.S. political-legal-journalistic system, autopsies are being neglected and manipulated. Recent history of this needs to include the case of John F. Kennedy's assassination. I recommend the 2014 book by Jacob Hornberger, 'The Kennedy Autopsy'. A second part of this is available in a 2019 which I have not yet read. Exculpatory autopsy and ballistic evidence was blatantly ans audaciously ignored in the conjoined case of the murder of Robert F. Kennedy as is now well known among intelligent and properly-informed members of the public. There were a great many serious problems with the autopsy of George Floyd and the associated report. These are examined here, "The Chauvin Case, Part 1: George Floyd May Have Suffered From Acromegaly,"
Another instance of poor crime-scene and autopsy procedure and reporting was the massive event occurring in Las Vegas in 2017, described to us as a massacre occurring in an enclosed paddock (ironically, the name of the purported killer, Stephen Paddock) wherein was hosted the Route 91 Music Festival with hundreds of attendees.
I will only mention the enormous events of the Oklahoma City-Murrah Building Bombing and the biggest of them all: 9/11. In the latter case, regarding autopsies, we do have the case of the "dog that didn't bark." That is, of the thousands killed in that holocaust, there are no bodies. There is a possible Long-9/11 story as well related to what may be eventually be recorded in history books as the 2020 COVIDian Scam. In short, I want to know more about a possible epidemiological connection between the supposed ('susposed'?) COVID deaths and any patterns of lung damage and cancers in those in the NYC area at that time, especially near to any plume.
And I almost forgot, regarding COVID itself, did anyone say "autopsies?" Here, a systematic program of autopsies and correlation with symptomology, immunologocal studies and epidemiological work was absolutely indicated, but was of course ignored---to the shame of health agencies and the medical community at large.
The public should not be left with glaring absences of coherent information regarding these kinds of history-making events. For a government so concerned, at least that is what we are told, the cognitive and psychological toll of such lack of credible information is extremely harmful. We hope that this is not--but must keep open the possibility that this is--the intended goal.
I studied the 911 incident in detail in around 2OO8. The conclusion that I did come to eventually was that laser weaponry of an extremely advanced nature was used on those buildings as Judy Woods courageously declared. It is also being employed to burn various places like Maui and Paradise Valley and LA. It is aa precision tool that can be deployed from a distance to start fires and precipitate building collapses.
The nuclear option would also explain the electro-magnetic signatures that were present at the time of the event. The fried car bodies away from the buildings would also be within the affects of a nuclear device.
And now many years later there are documented excess cancers in the NYC area. Sorry I don't remember where I read about the excess cancer.
It is certainly the case that 9/11 is not the fairy book story they told us as a social pacifier. I wrote a little Substack commentary on the Maui and Paradise Fires The Palisades Fire had not yet occurred, though I commented about in scattered locations thereafter. Don't forget the Tubbs-Santa Rosa Fire either. These are very peculiar events, though the late Rosa Koire, author of 'Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21'. If I recall correctly, she discounted the existence of conspiracy connection behind the Santa Rosa Fire---though I can no longer find that reference. Perhaps someone can help out regarding this question.
Since I have mentioned her name, here is a very video of Rosa Koire speaking in Denmark: https://youtu.be/7ykELwj1Ta8. This is worth sharing just as a conversation starter.
Sometimes commentors are urged to stay "on topic." We have now reached a stage where everything is connected, everything is relevant, everything is "on topic." Is this related to the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Yes, I say. How do we know? Well, it seems some of the same people are doing the hiding of interesting details.
Thanks for your take on Charlie Kirk. This incident has a really bad smell even though I tried at first to write it off as just more "internet" mindless chatter.
Unfortunately it seems like another attack on innocent civilians using high tech props to prolong the trauma.
I agree that we have reached a stage where "everything is connected"
The toxic fumes from the WTC collapse caused numerous health problems for the fire fighters and everyone who lived near by. AF Major Robert Bowman attended a 9-11 conference sponsored by our group in Ann Arbor Mi but died shortly afterwards...from unspecified causes. He was a magnificent human being who risked a lot to come forward with his story. William Rodrigez was also at this conference. I had believed at that time that the attacks from "elite" controllers were isolated events. I think differently now.
All of these attacks including the "wildfires" happening in a variety of places now were planned out long ago with hopes of herding humanity into a "kill pen".
I find it all very disturbing and sad. I live in an area that is not "in the plan" as it is an isolated mountain community in North Carolina. People here have seen a lot of abuse from the "higher-ups" And they don't seem want to take it anymore. This community has been mistreated and ignored by the Feds after horrendous "hurricane" damage.
I had never heard of Chatter Kirk until after he died. Odd behaviour at the shooting shown by Mikey McCoy Charlie Kirk's "Chief of staff". I got the feeling a few different people around Charlie had a heads up about the events that day. A man with a camera which he lowered then slowly backed away from the scene of the shooting and calmly melted into the screaming melee.
are you aware that M. Massie grew 3 inches taller and grew a beard shortly after his wife was killed by "friendly fire"? They replaced him. get on it. let's hear your version of that.
I've always believed Israel killed Kirk,but will Robinson be just another patty boy?
The audio for FFWN was really bad this week and we couldn't hear a word Helen said. Too bad. Can you post a transcript of the show on Substack tomorrow. Thanks, Kevin.
People are now asking whether "Tyler Robinson" even exists.
I never had heard of Charlie Kirk before he was purportedly "gunned down". It has now been exposed that Erica Kirk's mother had long standing relations and influence with various governmental agencies. Since I never looked into TPSA or any of their connections ...it all seems quite strange. I suppose that it is entirely possibly he WAS gunned down. If so then I am sure the perps had various octopus like reasons. Celia Farber has written interesting observations about Erika Kirk's mother.
Charlie didn’t die that day. No funeral was held, there was no ballistics analysis, there was no blood splatter behind him, there is no autopsy, his fake hands in the casket, his wife’s fake tears and acting job, the crime scene was not locked down, there was no air support for a shooter on the loose, the crime scene was covered up with concrete and destroyed, the shooter would be visible by a security team, there was no ambulance, there was no blood trail to the SUV, etc. The bottom line is Charlie was a controlled shill and I think he pretended to go against Israel as part of the cover story to be used to take him out. He was losing debates to flunky college stoners on the Israel and jewish issues so that had to be stopped. Remember our jewish masters want people to be angry with jews so they can get antisemitism legislation passed. That’s the ultimate goal and it indeed did pass in the house in 2024 and sits with the senate currently. They will continue the fake pograms until we get imprisoned for speaking truth about these demons.
A much more compelling motive is that Kirk was actively working against "Israel's" strategic interest when it came to Iran, by moderating Trump's response against what "Israel" wanted, which cost "Israel" dearly, as well moderating Trump on the Ukraine issue, also a Zionist strategic ambition. Trump has a shelf life that he was paid well by the ziocons to implement their strategic interest, and Kirk was ticking it down against them.
One could even go as far to say that taking Kirk out would have been a strategic imperative, as well the rest of the alleged influencers that was supporting him in that influence. And we can see that neutralization continue, and certainly those at the top of the list, need to keep frosty (is there any other way?).
I'm surprised nobody else is talking about this much more likely motive, not that the lessor sins wasn't enough to get him whacked, but when it comes to the little gangster state's strategic ambitions, the stepping stones are measured as vast multitude of bodies.
The kirk mishap was likely as much a message to Trump as anyone else, stay bought or else. When it comes to that betrayal of trust regarding their strategic imperatives, it becomes personal, and we all know they aren't the forgiving gangster types.
It doesn't so far appear to matter how much forensic evidence there is 'post mortem', dis-proving the official narratives. Once that official account has been posted and nailed to the door, with all it's authority system adherents and media enablers pulled into line 'corroborating' the psyop; then it's a done deal. Nothing seems to penetrate that titanium firewall between later exposed truths, and the original lie.
The Christchurch Mosque attack is a recent example, where a 1m18sec iphone clip clearly shows the staging of the secondary attack at the Linwood Community Centre; right down to an old fellow being directed to play dead; which he comfortably does; only to get up and wander casually off for a cup of tea at the end of it. But nothing shifted: nothing changed in the official narratives to account for this clear evidence of staging. The dataset didn't exist because media and the judiciary never saw it and if they did, they didn't report it.
And we all know, if it is not reported, it didn't happen.
ZioBeasts are immune to everything except Iranian missiles
Israel delenda est
There's a vid showing a khaki-uniformed man standing right in front of Kirk, only the fence between them. He points to Kirk with a palm-pistol, barrel between his fingers and triggers ...
Images of this device are to be found publicly.
Another vid with the same person from behind, assisting when Kirk was dragged to a vehicle and the round bulge from the palm-pistol shows in his rear pocket.
Only time will tell, but as things look, the currently living will never know ...
Maybe, a deeper search for Alexis Wilkins, Patel's current girl friend could uncover some more details. She's being accused of being a Mossad-asset ...
SANS AUTOPSIES and BALLISTIC REPORTS, WE ARE HAMSTRUNG, BUT WE CAN INFER SOME THINGS RE: THE ASSASSINATION OF MR. CHARLIE KIRK
I find Dr. Martenson's analysis very engaging and worthwhile, indeed. Prior to his, I provided my own based on my experience, not as a marksman (which I am not), but having experience teaching cadaver anatomy and being a little bit handy with physics. See here,
"FIRST FACT: Charlie Kirk couldn't have been killed by a .30-06 round from the Losee Center rooftop. Now things gets interesting: government, captured organizational or private involvement seem likely."
https://dschmitt.substack.com/p/first-fact-charlie-kirk-couldnt-have
I offer a hypothesis that diverges from Dr. Martenson's. I do not believe the additional angle of elevation that he presumes can explain a sufficient deflection of the bullet that is consistent with what we've been told. This latter point is the obstacle. We do not have an autopsy report nor an x-ray study of Mr. Kirk's body postmortem. Put simply, the ballistics involved, as the government has told us as established fact, cannot account for the recorded pressure waves dynamically distorting the skull of the victim, nor the extensive vertebral damage and described involvement of the elements thereof, nor the lack of exit wounds or, alternatively--if we are to believe the claim of a bullet captured within the victim's body--the lack of backward thrust of the body in response to the sizable momentum of the alleged missile.
It turns out that in the the U.S. political-legal-journalistic system, autopsies are being neglected and manipulated. Recent history of this needs to include the case of John F. Kennedy's assassination. I recommend the 2014 book by Jacob Hornberger, 'The Kennedy Autopsy'. A second part of this is available in a 2019 which I have not yet read. Exculpatory autopsy and ballistic evidence was blatantly ans audaciously ignored in the conjoined case of the murder of Robert F. Kennedy as is now well known among intelligent and properly-informed members of the public. There were a great many serious problems with the autopsy of George Floyd and the associated report. These are examined here, "The Chauvin Case, Part 1: George Floyd May Have Suffered From Acromegaly,"
https://dschmitt.substack.com/p/the-chauvin-case-part-1-george-floyd
and here, "The Chauvin Case, Part 2: The Anatomy of the Neck Argues Against Asphyxiation,"
https://dschmitt.substack.com/p/the-chauvin-case-part-2-the-anatomy
Another instance of poor crime-scene and autopsy procedure and reporting was the massive event occurring in Las Vegas in 2017, described to us as a massacre occurring in an enclosed paddock (ironically, the name of the purported killer, Stephen Paddock) wherein was hosted the Route 91 Music Festival with hundreds of attendees.
I will only mention the enormous events of the Oklahoma City-Murrah Building Bombing and the biggest of them all: 9/11. In the latter case, regarding autopsies, we do have the case of the "dog that didn't bark." That is, of the thousands killed in that holocaust, there are no bodies. There is a possible Long-9/11 story as well related to what may be eventually be recorded in history books as the 2020 COVIDian Scam. In short, I want to know more about a possible epidemiological connection between the supposed ('susposed'?) COVID deaths and any patterns of lung damage and cancers in those in the NYC area at that time, especially near to any plume.
And I almost forgot, regarding COVID itself, did anyone say "autopsies?" Here, a systematic program of autopsies and correlation with symptomology, immunologocal studies and epidemiological work was absolutely indicated, but was of course ignored---to the shame of health agencies and the medical community at large.
The public should not be left with glaring absences of coherent information regarding these kinds of history-making events. For a government so concerned, at least that is what we are told, the cognitive and psychological toll of such lack of credible information is extremely harmful. We hope that this is not--but must keep open the possibility that this is--the intended goal.
I studied the 911 incident in detail in around 2OO8. The conclusion that I did come to eventually was that laser weaponry of an extremely advanced nature was used on those buildings as Judy Woods courageously declared. It is also being employed to burn various places like Maui and Paradise Valley and LA. It is aa precision tool that can be deployed from a distance to start fires and precipitate building collapses.
COGNITIVE DISONANCE is intended in my opinion
Kathleen have you seen this as an explanation for the 9/11 distruction?
https://veteranstoday.com/2021/05/28/the-real-able-danger-the-real-9-11-investigation-team-speaks-out-on-the-nuclear-coverup/
The nuclear option would also explain the electro-magnetic signatures that were present at the time of the event. The fried car bodies away from the buildings would also be within the affects of a nuclear device.
And now many years later there are documented excess cancers in the NYC area. Sorry I don't remember where I read about the excess cancer.
It is certainly the case that 9/11 is not the fairy book story they told us as a social pacifier. I wrote a little Substack commentary on the Maui and Paradise Fires The Palisades Fire had not yet occurred, though I commented about in scattered locations thereafter. Don't forget the Tubbs-Santa Rosa Fire either. These are very peculiar events, though the late Rosa Koire, author of 'Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21'. If I recall correctly, she discounted the existence of conspiracy connection behind the Santa Rosa Fire---though I can no longer find that reference. Perhaps someone can help out regarding this question.
Since I have mentioned her name, here is a very video of Rosa Koire speaking in Denmark: https://youtu.be/7ykELwj1Ta8. This is worth sharing just as a conversation starter.
Sometimes commentors are urged to stay "on topic." We have now reached a stage where everything is connected, everything is relevant, everything is "on topic." Is this related to the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Yes, I say. How do we know? Well, it seems some of the same people are doing the hiding of interesting details.
Thanks for your take on Charlie Kirk. This incident has a really bad smell even though I tried at first to write it off as just more "internet" mindless chatter.
Unfortunately it seems like another attack on innocent civilians using high tech props to prolong the trauma.
I agree that we have reached a stage where "everything is connected"
The toxic fumes from the WTC collapse caused numerous health problems for the fire fighters and everyone who lived near by. AF Major Robert Bowman attended a 9-11 conference sponsored by our group in Ann Arbor Mi but died shortly afterwards...from unspecified causes. He was a magnificent human being who risked a lot to come forward with his story. William Rodrigez was also at this conference. I had believed at that time that the attacks from "elite" controllers were isolated events. I think differently now.
All of these attacks including the "wildfires" happening in a variety of places now were planned out long ago with hopes of herding humanity into a "kill pen".
I find it all very disturbing and sad. I live in an area that is not "in the plan" as it is an isolated mountain community in North Carolina. People here have seen a lot of abuse from the "higher-ups" And they don't seem want to take it anymore. This community has been mistreated and ignored by the Feds after horrendous "hurricane" damage.
I had never heard of Chatter Kirk until after he died. Odd behaviour at the shooting shown by Mikey McCoy Charlie Kirk's "Chief of staff". I got the feeling a few different people around Charlie had a heads up about the events that day. A man with a camera which he lowered then slowly backed away from the scene of the shooting and calmly melted into the screaming melee.
are you aware that M. Massie grew 3 inches taller and grew a beard shortly after his wife was killed by "friendly fire"? They replaced him. get on it. let's hear your version of that.
I've always believed Israel killed Kirk,but will Robinson be just another patty boy?
The audio for FFWN was really bad this week and we couldn't hear a word Helen said. Too bad. Can you post a transcript of the show on Substack tomorrow. Thanks, Kevin.
He's just doing his job.