911. 500,000 tons of steel, concrete, glass, porcelaine all turned to powder in less than a minute. No significant temperature rise. Nobody burned. forget about the thermite, there wasn't much, it just wasn't important.
I have to disagree w/ Ellefritz re 9/11 and who/what constitutes controlled opposition/infiltration. Advanced/semi-secret technologies need to be considered not dismissed as too outrageous. Was cold fusion too outrageous for young Steven Jones so that he had to suppress it? Is Judy Wood too outrageous because she points out anomalies that others refuse to notice?
So the damage done by the DEW is reduced to toasted cars, internally burning jumpers and weird cold fires - veritable side show attractions. While the destruction of the towers is attributed to super thermal energy. "The thermal energy required to destroy (let alone “dustify”) 1.1 million tons of concrete and steel would be enormous. Perhaps equal to a major volcano eruption."
This is not well thought out. Any super thermal weapon, like a mini nuke or 2 or 3 or 7 of them, is going to incinerate all the paper floating around the site, not to mention give the grounds crew hot feet from hell. And Jones, the establishment prof who put the kibosh on cold fusion, suggests huge quantities of coated thermate did the trick, yet the applied material somehow didn't afford the slightest glimpse of its signature ignition flash. And Hua Bin wants to redeem Jones's discredited theory as the main event. Phooey to that.
I think Ron Unz has done a fantastic job of summarizing lots of excellent revisionist scholarship on the two World Wars, among other issues. A good starting point is: https://www.unz.com/page/world-war-ii-articles/
51-49 with James Li YouTube channel name of James Li
226K subscribers
163,667 views Jan 16, 2026
"In this episode of 51-49, James exposes the authoritarian reality behind the ADL’s facade, moving from Jonathan Greenblatt’s admission of a 24/7 FBI-coordinated surveillance network to the infiltration of AI models and Evangelical curricula, ultimately revealing how a tax-exempt non-profit has morphed into a hostile intelligence apparatus prioritizing foreign interests over American civil liberties."
______
Dachsie note:
LLM stands for Large Language Model
Large language model - Wikipedia
LLMs can generate code based on problems or instructions written in natural language. They can also describe code in natural language or translate it into other programming languages.
911. 500,000 tons of steel, concrete, glass, porcelaine all turned to powder in less than a minute. No significant temperature rise. Nobody burned. forget about the thermite, there wasn't much, it just wasn't important.
disillusionist
Mark Crispin Miller is with NYU.
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/
I have to disagree w/ Ellefritz re 9/11 and who/what constitutes controlled opposition/infiltration. Advanced/semi-secret technologies need to be considered not dismissed as too outrageous. Was cold fusion too outrageous for young Steven Jones so that he had to suppress it? Is Judy Wood too outrageous because she points out anomalies that others refuse to notice?
I agree with Hua Bin's take on the strengths and weaknesses of Judy Wood's book (which I own and value). https://www.unz.com/bhua/maduros-kidnapping-directed-energy-weapons-and-9-11-judy-wood-hypothesis/
So the damage done by the DEW is reduced to toasted cars, internally burning jumpers and weird cold fires - veritable side show attractions. While the destruction of the towers is attributed to super thermal energy. "The thermal energy required to destroy (let alone “dustify”) 1.1 million tons of concrete and steel would be enormous. Perhaps equal to a major volcano eruption."
This is not well thought out. Any super thermal weapon, like a mini nuke or 2 or 3 or 7 of them, is going to incinerate all the paper floating around the site, not to mention give the grounds crew hot feet from hell. And Jones, the establishment prof who put the kibosh on cold fusion, suggests huge quantities of coated thermate did the trick, yet the applied material somehow didn't afford the slightest glimpse of its signature ignition flash. And Hua Bin wants to redeem Jones's discredited theory as the main event. Phooey to that.
Great excerpt, I’ll be listening in later!
Speaking of historical narratives that are propagated through compromised institutions…
Are there any documentaries, articles, you’d recommend for a more accurate grasp on significant historical events?
Have you seen the “Europa: The Last Battle” documentary? That seems comprehensive.
I think Ron Unz has done a fantastic job of summarizing lots of excellent revisionist scholarship on the two World Wars, among other issues. A good starting point is: https://www.unz.com/page/world-war-ii-articles/
Here's what grew out of 9-11-01 false event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me6W1mKIjr8
12:35 video runtime
It’s worse than we thought...
51-49 with James Li YouTube channel name of James Li
226K subscribers
163,667 views Jan 16, 2026
"In this episode of 51-49, James exposes the authoritarian reality behind the ADL’s facade, moving from Jonathan Greenblatt’s admission of a 24/7 FBI-coordinated surveillance network to the infiltration of AI models and Evangelical curricula, ultimately revealing how a tax-exempt non-profit has morphed into a hostile intelligence apparatus prioritizing foreign interests over American civil liberties."
______
Dachsie note:
LLM stands for Large Language Model
Large language model - Wikipedia
LLMs can generate code based on problems or instructions written in natural language. They can also describe code in natural language or translate it into other programming languages.
Very interesting listen Kevin, your a good man.
I never realised a Doctor and Lecturer could say "You know" so many times