AOL Reviews and Accepts "Israel Killed JFK" Comment
Then Re-Reviews and Rejects It Four Hours Later
Earlier today, NBC News published a surprisingly fair and informative JFK assassination story. Headlined “'What are they hiding?': Group sues Biden and National Archives over JFK assassination records,” Mark Caputo’s piece details the Mary Ferrell Foundation’s lawsuit demanding that the federal government comply with the JFK Records Act and release the 16,000 records that, by law, it was required to release back in 2017.
Since the headline asked “what are they hiding?” I was happy to answer the question in a succinct comment:
Israel killed JFK, using its CIA assets like James Angleton and mob assets like Meyer Lansky, to eliminate an obstacle to its nuclear weapons program, and put its man LBJ in the White House in preparation for the 1967 land grab. Free online book: https://www.unz.com/book/michael_collins_piper__final-judgment/
I was not surprised when my post didn’t immediately go through, but instead elicited a warning: “Sure about this? Your post is more likely to get published if you keep the conversation civil.” My post was perfectly civil, so I clicked on “post anyway” which elicited “your comment is under review.” About an hour later, I received an email stating that the post had been approved. It appeared beneath the article, garnered a couple of “likes”—and then was taken down shortly before 8 pm. (See screenshot at the top of this article.)
I am reasonably certain that if I had blamed the JFK assassination on Oswald, Ruby, the CIA, the mob, fascists, militarists, the military-industrial complex, Russia, Cuba, French intelligence, Oliver Stone, aliens, or the man in the moon, AOL would not have seen anything less than civil in my comment. But blaming the nation whose intelligence services actually did it is taboo. Why is that? Who made those rules? Who enforces them?
As the headline says: What are they hiding?
Obviously the people who killed both Kennedys (and did 9/11) couldn’t have executed either coup d’état without controlling the media. So ask yourself: What group controls the media to the extent that you can’t even post a comment casting aspersions on their favorite nation?
@_WhitneyWebb @grahamelwood We need a special #InternationalCriminalCourt investigation to connect dots exposed in OneNationUnderBlackmail & global banking fraud exposed by @PeteBrewton: #Bush's Business Ties with the Mafia, the CIA Cover-Up and Bush Fa... https://youtu.be/i4wke_OcInI
James Angleton (they have a plaque for him in israel) gave mossad details of the CIA plot to kill JFK which they then piggybacked leaving the plotters to cover up. Two agents masquarading as translators (and staying at Jack Ruby's apt, one of whom is actually mentioned in Warren as having picked up a call to the apt from a cleaning lady inquiring for work) shot JFK from in front. Zapruder (who was archiving like the yids in 911 carpark, don't tell me a first time amateur was in possession of the best videocam of the time by accident) clearly filmed the hit, and frame 33 which did show the backward movement (upon which Jackie instinctively tried to retrieve pieces of skull) proving the kill shot was from in front was suppressed for many years. If you think a jew (Ruby) was so aggrieved upon a Catholic presidents death that he went on to kill oswald, I have a Canyon in Arizona to sell you. And really only the synagogue of satan (milchan & co, financier of stone JFK) has the power to "grassy knoll" goyim for so long? Mathew 10:26.